Joanna Saul, Director
Corrections Institution Inspection Committee
Riffe Center, l5th Floor
77 South High Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215
May 14, 2016
Dear Director Saul:
I enclose communication from Trevor Clark. His misrepresentations notwithstanding, this written communication demonstrates that (1) his ever-evolving rationale for justifying my 12 Monkey frame-up continues to evolve; (2) his ever-evolving rationale does not get any more constitutional the more he changes his stories; and (3) he is now throwing prisoners under the bus by falsely snitch-jacketing them and recklessly creating the very real potential of getting prisoners harmed or killed.
Someone needs to do something about this guy. You will recall that in 2012, in NANCI-12-007219, I was designated a “leader” of the Army of the 12 Monkeys, by the State’s own story, due to my “ideology.” I was accused of no conduct whatsoever, but was “ideologically matched” to persons engaged in misconduct. I All of my appeals were exhausted and I was slated to super-duper-max when supporters hired counsel.
Director Mohr then reversed the disposition after having affirmed it. At that point, ODRC Counsel Trevor Clark brought another conduct report in MANCI-13-002907, one that claimed I was not really targeted, segregated and tortured for my ideology as the State admitted before I retained counsel, but that I was segregated in 2012 for events that would occur six months later in 2013. This second story was designed to remedy the illegality of the first story.
Mr. Clark must be psychic. I was segregated before the misconduct I was accused of committing. According to disclosures in federal court, in this do-over, Clark wrote the conduct report, advised the R.I.B., and then affirmed the decision they had made on the conduct report that he wrote. That was the due process I was afforded. Further, based on the documentation in the disciplinary process generated before the R.I.B. hearing, the R.I.B. chair and Mr. Clark both demonstrably knew I would be found guilty and sent to level 4B before the R.I.B. process ever occurred, demonstrating a pre- determined outcome.(2)
On top of all of that, I was subjected to what the C.I.A. calls the “simple torture situation” in their KUBARK Counterintelligence and Interrogation Manual. I was tortured. My counsel, Richard Kerger, filed a federal civil rights action. When the obstruction and harassment of communication between counsel and myself made the prosecution of the case impossible, I moved to voluntarily dismiss the action without prejudice. As I wrote in that motion, which was granted, “The reasons for this request are that Plaintiff’s counsel has moved to withdraw from this case and Defendants’ harassment of Plaintiff’s communications mediums make this action impossible to prosecute.”(3)
Apparently, Mr. Clark, being a mediocre attorney at best, was apparently unaware that actions that are voluntarily dismissed can be brought back with an amended complaint within one year. That is why, about a month later, Clark came to Warren Correctional to resume his shenanigans, thinking the dismissal of the civil action put him in the clear.
I corresponded with Mr. Clark after he came here, and we exchanged two written correspondences. In the one enclosed, Clark presents a bullet list of the “evidence” of my “guilt” in the 12 Monkey frame-up. The misrepresentations notwithstanding, please note that the seven items of “evidence” were never mentioned in my R.I.B. hearings and never presented at any course of any proceedings. In other words, Clark “advised” the R.I.B., outside my presence in a “secret tribunal” where my guilt was determined, where I was never provided an opportunity to review and challenge any alleged evidence of anything. The actual rationale for my finding of guilt was only divulged to me four years after I was segregated.
I now have the right to die in prison for a non-crime.
But, something I hope you will agree is even more disturbing is Mr. Clark’s written allegation at the top of page 2 of his letter: “Two of your co-conspirators implicated you directly. One of which indicated your involvement to three separate investigators.”
Clearly, Mr. Clark is stating outright that James Dzelajlija and Les Dillon are “snitches.” Clearly, he is stating outright that both of the other two prisoners accused of 12 Monkey involvement implicated me. One of them, he claims, directly implicated me to investigators several times.
I am sharing Clark’s letter with both Dzelajlija and with Dillon, and I will be sharing a copy of his letter with the County Prosecutors of Franklin County and Warren County, as I firmly believe that Mr. Clark engaged in criminal misconduct by “outing” two prisoners as “snitches,” which is particularly
reprehensible if, in fact, as I suspect, neither of them were snitches in any way. So, I suspect, Trevor Clark has again engaged in untruths in an effort to save himself from his past pattern of untruths. A copy of this correspondence will be sent out for posting along with a scanned copy of Mr. Clark’s correspondence to me.
Thank you for your time and kind consideration.
Freedom or Death,
Anarchist Prisoner Sean
1 To claim I shared the “ideology” of others doing wrong and was therefore a party to the misconduct is like saying that someone has the same psychological profile as persons who commit violent crimes and was therefore the shooter in the grassy knoll who killed JFK.
2 This is the hearing where I tricked Clark into admitting that he gave me the home addresses of Ohio Senators and Representatives- which is why he will not turn over the digital recording of the hearing to anyone and also why he continues to carry out a childish vendetta.
3 Swain v. Mohr, et al., U.S. District Court Case No. CASE NO. 4:14-CV-002074.